Screener
PCS vs PHYL
PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF vs PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
Key differences
- PCS costs 0.19% less per year.
- PHYL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCS | PHYL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $520M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 7.71% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.30% |
| Max drawdown | -1.12% | -22.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCS and PHYL
Explore further