Screener
PCY vs BEMB
Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF vs Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- BEMB costs 0.35% less per year.
- PCY is significantly larger than BEMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PCY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PCY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PCY | BEMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $43M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.90% | 6.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.45% | 4.25% |
| Max drawdown | -38.02% | -6.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PCY and BEMB
Explore further