Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PEJ vs QQQM

Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

PEJ

Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.57%

Fund size

$245M

QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Invesco

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$82.9B

Key differences

  • QQQM costs 0.42% less per year.
  • QQQM is significantly larger than PEJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, QQQM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • PEJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

PEJQQQM
Annual cost (TER)0.57%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$245M$82.9B
Since20052020
Dividend yield0.40%0.46%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+21.5%+44.0%
CAGR 3Y+15.5%+30.3%
CAGR 5Y+7.9%+18.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.621.27
Volatility 1Y18.60%16.06%
Max drawdown-58.96%-35.04%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PEJ and QQQM