Screener
PEPS vs CGUS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- PEPS costs 0.23% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than PEPS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PEPS is classified as alternative, while CGUS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PEPS follows a option income strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEPS | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.6% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.22% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -9.79% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEPS and CGUS
Explore further