Screener
PEPS vs PFUT
Parametric Equity Plus ETF vs Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
Key differences
- PEPS costs 0.54% less per year.
- PEPS is significantly larger than PFUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PEPS is classified as alternative, while PFUT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PEPS follows a option income strategy; PFUT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEPS | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $5M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.9% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.21% | 16.25% |
| Max drawdown | -9.79% | -44.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEPS and PFUT
Explore further