Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PEPS vs PHYD

Parametric Equity Plus ETF vs Putnam ESG High Yield ETF

PEPS

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

Eaton Vance ETFs

Annual cost

0.10%

Fund size

$26M

PHYD

Putnam ESG High Yield ETF

Franklin Templeton Investments

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$8M

Key differences

  • PEPS costs 0.45% less per year.
  • PEPS is significantly larger than PHYD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • PEPS is classified as alternative, while PHYD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • PEPS follows a option income strategy; PHYD uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

PEPSPHYD
Annual cost (TER)0.10%0.55%
Fund size (AUM)$26M$8M
Since20242023
Dividend yield0.94%8.54%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+34.9%+9.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+9.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.24
Volatility 1Y13.21%3.31%
Max drawdown-9.79%-4.33%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PEPS and PHYD