Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PEPS vs PY

Parametric Equity Plus ETF vs Principal Value ETF

PEPS

Parametric Equity Plus ETF

Eaton Vance ETFs

Annual cost

0.10%

Fund size

$26M

PY

Principal Value ETF

Principal Funds

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$212M

Key differences

  • PY is significantly larger than PEPS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • PEPS is classified as alternative, while PY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • PEPS follows a option income strategy; PY uses active selection.
  • PY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

PEPSPY
Annual cost (TER)0.10%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$26M$212M
Since20242016
Dividend yield0.94%2.15%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+32.6%+17.0%
CAGR 3YN/A+13.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.75
Volatility 1Y13.22%10.74%
Max drawdown-9.79%-45.44%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to PEPS and PY