Screener
PEX vs ICLN
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 2.56% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PEX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ICLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PEX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2013 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 12.12% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -10.0% | +87.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.39% | 25.93% |
| Max drawdown | -49.17% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PEX and ICLN
Explore further