Screener
PFDE vs RODM
Pathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Key differences
- RODM costs 0.30% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than PFDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFDE covers north america markets; RODM covers global.
- PFDE follows a active selection strategy; RODM uses index enhanced.
- RODM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFDE | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.77% |
| Max drawdown | -10.37% | -35.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFDE and RODM
Explore further