Screener
PFFA vs SEIX
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF vs Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- SEIX costs 1.54% less per year.
- PFFA is significantly larger than SEIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFFA follows a active selection strategy; SEIX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFA | SEIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.11% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $242M |
| Since | 2018 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 9.57% | 7.33% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +5.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 1.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.07% | 1.60% |
| Max drawdown | -70.52% | -17.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFA and SEIX
Explore further