Screener
PFFD vs QRMI
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- PFFD costs 0.37% less per year.
- PFFD is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFFD is classified as fixed income, while QRMI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PFFD follows a index tracking strategy; QRMI uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFD | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $16M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 6.30% | 12.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.1% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.2% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.21% | 5.77% |
| Max drawdown | -30.93% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFD and QRMI
Explore further