Screener
PFFV vs SPFF
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF vs Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.23% less per year.
- SPFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFV | SPFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $302M | $148M |
| Since | 2020 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 8.13% | 6.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.6% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.20% | 9.51% |
| Max drawdown | -18.95% | -35.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFV and SPFF
Explore further