Screener
PFFV vs XRMI
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.35% less per year.
- PFFV is significantly larger than XRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFFV is classified as fixed income, while XRMI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PFFV follows a index tracking strategy; XRMI uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, PFFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFFV | XRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $302M | $49M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 8.13% | 12.65% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.9% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.20% | 5.42% |
| Max drawdown | -18.95% | -15.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFFV and XRMI
Explore further