Screener
PFIG vs CGCB
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Capital Group Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.05% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than PFIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFIG follows a index tracking strategy; CGCB uses active selection.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | CGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2011 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 3.99% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -5.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIG and CGCB
Explore further