Screener
PFIG vs GTOQ
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.17% less per year.
- PFIG is classified as fixed income, while GTOQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PFIG follows a index tracking strategy; GTOQ uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | GTOQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $162M |
| Since | 2011 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 6.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 3.76% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -15.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIG and GTOQ
Explore further