Screener
PFIG vs ZTEN
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- ZTEN costs 0.07% less per year.
- PFIG is significantly larger than ZTEN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFIG covers north america markets; ZTEN covers global.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | ZTEN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $30M |
| Since | 2011 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 5.56% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 5.06% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -5.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIG and ZTEN
Explore further