Screener
PFIX vs TUA
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF vs Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- TUA costs 0.25% less per year.
- TUA is significantly larger than PFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFIX follows a tactical allocation strategy; TUA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIX | TUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $802M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.58% | 3.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -13.6% | -1.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | -2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.54 | -0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.79% | 6.85% |
| Max drawdown | -36.17% | -15.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFIX and TUA
Explore further