Screener
PFM vs DIVG
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- DIVG costs 0.13% less per year.
- PFM is significantly larger than DIVG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFM | DIVG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $764M | $10M |
| Since | 2005 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.4% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.63% | 10.81% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -14.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFM and DIVG
Explore further