Screener
PFM vs IGRO
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF vs iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- IGRO costs 0.37% less per year.
- PFM covers north america markets; IGRO covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, PFM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFM | IGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $764M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2005 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 2.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.4% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.63% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -36.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFM and IGRO
Explore further