Screener
PFM vs OMFS
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFS costs 0.13% less per year.
- PFM follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- PFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFM | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $764M | $275M |
| Since | 2005 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.62% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFM and OMFS
Explore further