Screener
PFM vs PKW
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- PFM costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFM | PKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $764M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.0% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.62% | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -32.21% | -40.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFM and PKW
Explore further