Screener
PFOE vs TMFX
Pathfinder Focused Opportunities ETF vs Motley Fool Next Index ETF
Key differences
- TMFX costs 0.09% less per year.
- PFOE is significantly larger than TMFX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFOE follows a active selection strategy; TMFX uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFOE | TMFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $105M | $31M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.77% |
| Max drawdown | -18.19% | -34.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFOE and TMFX
Explore further