Screener
PFUT vs BASV
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF
Key differences
- PFUT costs 0.07% less per year.
- BASV is significantly larger than PFUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFUT follows a index tracking strategy; BASV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFUT | BASV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.71% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $359M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.55 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.25% | — |
| Max drawdown | -44.85% | -9.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFUT and BASV
Explore further