Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

PFUT vs ISMF

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF

PFUT

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$4M

ISMF

iShares Managed Futures Active ETF

Annual cost

0.80%

Fund size

$59M

Key differences

PFUT is an equity ETF, while ISMF is an alternative ETF. PFUT charges 0.64% a year and ISMF 0.80%.

  • PFUT is an equity fund, while ISMF is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • PFUT follows a active selection strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
  • PFUT covers North America; ISMF covers global markets.
  • PFUT costs 0.16% less per year.
  • ISMF is much larger than PFUT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

PFUTISMF
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.80%
Fund size (AUM)$4M$59M
Since20212025
Dividend yield0.00%2.49%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyactive selectionmanaged futures
CAGR 1Y+3.8%+20.7%
CAGR 3Y+12.3%N/A
CAGR 5Y+0.4%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.52N/A
Volatility 1Y16.31%7.99%
Max drawdown-44.85%-4.23%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to PFUT and ISMF