Screener
PFXF vs RONB
VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF vs Baron First Principles ETF
Key differences
- PFXF costs 0.60% less per year.
- PFXF is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PFXF is classified as fixed income, while RONB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PFXF follows a index tracking strategy; RONB uses active selection.
- PFXF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFXF | RONB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $388M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.49% | -13.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFXF and RONB
Explore further