Screener
PFXF vs XAGG
VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF vs Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- PFXF costs 0.10% less per year.
- PFXF follows a index tracking strategy; XAGG uses active selection.
- XAGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFXF | XAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $963M |
| Since | 2012 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 6.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.86% | — |
| Max drawdown | -35.49% | -2.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PFXF and XAGG
Explore further