Screener
PGF vs VRP
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- VRP costs 0.05% less per year.
- VRP is significantly larger than PGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGF is classified as equity, while VRP is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, VRP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGF | VRP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $719M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 6.39% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.5% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 1.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -28.92% | -46.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGF and VRP
Explore further