Screener
PGRI vs INTL
Putnam International Stock ETF vs Main International ETF
Key differences
- PGRI is classified as fixed income, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PGRI covers emerging markets markets; INTL covers global.
- PGRI follows a index tracking strategy; INTL uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRI | INTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $222M |
| Since | — | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.37% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -14.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRI and INTL
Explore further