Screener
PGRO vs ACSG
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- PGRO is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGRO follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRO | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $15M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.73% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRO and ACSG
Explore further