Screener
PGRO vs FFLG
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF vs Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- PGRO follows a index tracking strategy; FFLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRO | FFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | — |
| Since | 2021 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +41.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.8% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 18.43% |
| Max drawdown | -34.73% | -44.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRO and FFLG
Explore further