Screener
PGX vs XAGG
Invesco Preferred ETF vs Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- PGX is significantly larger than XAGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PGX follows a index tracking strategy; XAGG uses active selection.
- XAGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGX | XAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.9B | $963M |
| Since | 2008 | 1997 |
| Dividend yield | 6.16% | 6.36% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.31 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.14% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.10% | -2.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGX and XAGG
Explore further