Screener
PHYD vs CGSM
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSM costs 0.30% less per year.
- CGSM is significantly larger than PHYD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHYD follows a active selection strategy; CGSM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYD | CGSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 8.54% | 3.04% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.2% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.28% | 1.34% |
| Max drawdown | -4.33% | -1.42% |
Similar to PHYD and CGSM
Explore further