Screener
PHYD vs HMOP
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF vs Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- HMOP costs 0.26% less per year.
- HMOP is significantly larger than PHYD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHYD follows a active selection strategy; HMOP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PHYD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYD | HMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $740M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 8.54% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.2% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.28% | 2.73% |
| Max drawdown | -4.33% | -13.12% |
Similar to PHYD and HMOP
Explore further