Screener
PHYL vs GTOQ
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF vs Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- PHYL is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHYL is classified as fixed income, while GTOQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PHYL follows a active selection strategy; GTOQ uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYL | GTOQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $162M |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 7.71% | 6.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.3% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.26% | 3.60% |
| Max drawdown | -22.07% | -15.96% |
Similar to PHYL and GTOQ
Explore further