Screener
PHYL vs PCS
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF vs PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF
Key differences
- PCS costs 0.19% less per year.
- PHYL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHYL | PCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $520M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 7.71% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.30% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.07% | -1.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHYL and PCS
Explore further