Screener
PICK vs EFV
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
- EFV costs 0.08% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than PICK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PICK | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $30.0B |
| Since | 2012 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.40% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +83.4% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.81% | 14.28% |
| Max drawdown | -52.73% | -43.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PICK and EFV
Explore further