Screener
PINK vs XLV
Simplify Health Care ETF vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLV costs 0.43% less per year.
- XLV is significantly larger than PINK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PINK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PINK | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $241M | $37.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.07% | 14.56% |
| Max drawdown | -18.77% | -28.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PINK and XLV
Explore further