Screener
PIT vs ISMF
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- PIT costs 0.25% less per year.
- PIT is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIT is classified as commodity, while ISMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIT | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $240M | $57M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.17% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | commodity | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | — | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +58.8% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.44% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -12.27% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIT and ISMF
Explore further