Screener
PLGI vs IWF
PL Growth and Income ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both PLGI and IWF are equity ETFs. PLGI charges 1.25% a year and IWF 0.18%. The main difference: PLGI follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- PLGI follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
- IWF costs 1.07% less per year.
- IWF is much larger than PLGI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PLGI | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.25% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $132.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.79% |
| Max drawdown | -7.26% | -32.72% |
Similar to PLGI and IWF
Explore further