Screener
PPH vs PJP
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF vs Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF
Key differences
- PPH costs 0.21% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PJP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPH | PJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $966M | $334M |
| Since | 2011 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.5% | +38.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -33.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPH and PJP
Explore further