Screener
PPH vs SMB
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF vs VanEck Short Muni ETF
Key differences
- SMB costs 0.29% less per year.
- PPH is significantly larger than SMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPH is classified as equity, while SMB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, PPH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPH | SMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $966M | $305M |
| Since | 2011 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | 2.69% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.2% | +3.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.4% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.9% | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | -0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.11% | 1.68% |
| Max drawdown | -29.70% | -12.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPH and SMB
Explore further