Screener
PPI vs EAOA
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- EAOA costs 0.40% less per year.
- PPI is significantly larger than EAOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while EAOA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; EAOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | EAOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $36M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 2.03% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 10.83% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -25.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and EAOA
Explore further