Screener
PPI vs RFFC
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.10% less per year.
- PPI is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPI is classified as alternative, while RFFC is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $29M |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 12.09% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and RFFC
Explore further