Screener
PPI vs WZRD
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- PPI costs 0.42% less per year.
- PPI is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $4M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -71.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and WZRD
Explore further