Screener
PRN vs PIZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- PRN costs 0.20% less per year.
- PRN follows a index tracking strategy; PIZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PRN | PIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $401M | $775M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +62.9% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.9% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.5% | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.19 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.32% | 20.15% |
| Max drawdown | -36.27% | -40.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PRN and PIZ
Explore further