Screener
PRTO vs AOA
RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- PRTO follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PRTO | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $3.0B |
| Since | — | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.12% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.58% |
| Max drawdown | -2.45% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Explore further