Screener
PRTO vs AOM
RCN Pareto Strategic Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
- PRTO follows a active selection strategy; AOM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| PRTO | AOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.7B |
| Since | — | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.04% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.51% |
| Max drawdown | -2.45% | -19.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Explore further