Screener
PSC vs BCHP
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.20% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than BCHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSC covers north america markets; BCHP covers global.
- PSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | BCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $223M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.83% | 15.85% |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -18.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSC and BCHP
Explore further