Screener
PSC vs DFAS
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- DFAS costs 0.12% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than PSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSC follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PSC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $14.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.83% | 16.89% |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSC and DFAS
Explore further