Screener
PSC vs IWM
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- IWM costs 0.19% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than PSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $76.9B |
| Since | 2016 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.5% | +19.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.93% | 19.29% |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -41.13% |
Similar to PSC and IWM
Explore further